Evaluating for learning and accountability in system innovation: Incorporating reflexivity in a logical framework

In this paper its argued that when flexibly applied and adapted to capture dynamics typical in systems innovation projects, the Log Frame Approach (LFA) ( and logical frameworks have considerable utility to support evaluation for both learning and accountability, and for identifying and addressing institutional logics, which leads to system innovation. We demonstrate this for the case of Primary Innovation, and compare our experiences with the limitations and solutions suggested by  when applying logic models, logical frameworks, programme theories or theories of change as part of an 'adapted accountability framework'