This chapter documents the learning process within the framework of innovation of soil fertility management practices that emerged from the implementation of Participatory Extension Approach (PEA) as part of service delivery reorientation within the Limpopo Department of Agriculture in South Africa.The chapter gives a narrative description of what transpired during the interaction between researchers, extension officers and farmers, the processes involved, the lessons and the conclusion.
En este documento se presenta un estudio de la Red de Cooperación para la Innovación y el Desarrollo del Territorio en temas forestales, en el Área de Influencia de la Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Delta del Paraná del INTA, con enfoque teórico de Análisis de Red Social. Los objetivos fueron describir la red, investigar su estructura y analizar si había sinergia entre Cooperación y Capital Social. Con una encuesta y entrevistas semi estructuradas, se dio cuenta de la existencia de redes de cooperación y de vínculos favorecedores del Capital Social.
The guide on Reflexive Monitoring in Action offers principles, practical guidelines as well as theory and tools. Additional tools, developed more recently, are provided separately. The guide and tools focus on three target groups: Reflexive monitors Consultants, innovation brokers and action researchers who are (or will be) handling the actual monitoring Innovation managers Project managers or innovation champions who feel responsible for the progress of the innovation process and the realisation of the system innovation ambition.
We are facing complex societal problems such as climate change, human conflict, poverty and inequality, and need innovative solutions. Multi-stakeholder processes (MSPs) are more and more seen as a critical way of coming to such innovative solutions. It is thought that when multiple stakeholders are able to meet, share experiences, learn together and contribute to decisions, new and innovative ways of dealing with problems are found and turned into action. Still, much remains to be understood about the role and effectiveness of social learning in multi-stakeholder settings.
This booklet grew out of a study on what makes for responsible scaling in the context of agrifood systems, thinking along the same lines as ideas that gave rise to the concept of responsible research and innovation. In our initial exploration, we brought together a number of angles on the topic area (Wigboldus and Leeuwis, 2013; Wigboldus et al. 2016).
Se presenta un estudio de la dinámica de relacionamiento que tiene lugar en los procesos de aprendizaje en sistemas de innovación agroalimentarios regionales, y la manera en que INTA interviene en ellos. El estudio se enfoca desde la perspectiva institucional del evolucionismo, utilizando como herramienta el concepto de redes elaborado desde la sociología del conocimiento. Se pone en juego el sistema de ciencia, tecnología e innovación, en cuanto a su coordinación, conformación y a las políticas públicas que lo rigen.
Este libro está dirigido a todos aquellos interesados en la innovación como fenómeno sistémico. El marco teórico general es el de los siste-mas de innovación, dada su capacidad de explicación de un fenómeno complejo, su centralidad en el diseño de políticas y –como se verá a lo largo del libro– su potencial para discutir los problemas del desarrollo. Este libro no pretende ser un manual, en el sentido que se presentarán elementos centrales y constitutivos del enfoque y relaciones de causas y consecuencias.
This book documents a unique series of 19 case studies where agricultural biotechnologies were used to serve the needs of smallholders in developing countries. They cover different regions, production systems, species and underlying socio-economic conditions in the crop (seven case studies), livestock (seven) and aquaculture/fisheries (five) sectors. Most of the case studies involve a single crop, livestock or fish species and a single biotechnology.
This report provides a synthesis of all findings and information generated through a “stocktaking” process that involved a desk study of Prolinnova documents and evaluation reports, a questionnaire to 40 staff members of international organizations in agricultural research and development (ARD), self-assessment by the Country Platforms (CPs) and backstopping visits to five CPs. In 2014, the Prolinnova network saw a need to re-strategise in a changing context, and started this process by reviewing the activities it had undertaken and assessing its own functioning.
This presentation for the Third Global Conference on Agricultural Research for Development (GCARD3,Johannesburg, South Africa, 5-8 April 2016) illustrates the main goals and activities of the Tropical Agriculture Platform, the multilateral facilitation mechanism established by the G20 to promote greater coherence and impact of capacity development (CD) for agricultural innovation systems (AIS).